ÂÒÂ×ÊÓÆµ

ÂÒÂ×ÊÓÆµ Law Review publishes new volume

The ÂÒÂ×ÊÓÆµ Law Review's latest volume includes articles examining the dissent in the Supreme Court's historic Obergefell v. Hodges decision,  the reasoning of a U.S. Court of Appeals in a book banning case and the lack of clarity in parts of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 

Volume 8, Issue One of the ÂÒÂ×ÊÓÆµ Law Review is available here.

Content in the volume includes: 

ARTICLES

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes and Chief Justice John Roberts’s Dissent in Obergefell v. Hodges
By Steven G. Calabresi & Hannah M. Begley

Banning Joseph Heller’s Catch-22: The Case of Minarcini v. Strongsville City School District and Issues of First Amendment Rights, Intellectual Freedom, and Censorship
By Anupama Pal 

ADA Open Issues: Transfers to Vacant Positions, Leaves of Absence, Telecommuting, and Other Accommodation Issues
By Lawrence P. Postol

REMARKS AND COMMENTS

Politics in Conflict: Why the Interests of States Inescapably Infuse International Humanitarian Law, the Case of Mexico’s Drug War
By Jessica Caplin 

Refusing to be One’s own Witness: How the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Differs in China, France, and the United States
By Michael V. Profit 

Knead to Know: Cracking Recipes and Trade Secret Law
By Babak Zarin

NOTES

Demystifying the Internet of Things: Industry Impact, Standardization Problems, and Legal Considerations
By Robin Kester

North Carolina’s Public Records Law and its Need to Change
By Deborah Moy